InspectExe: The Ultimate Tool for Analyzing Windows Executables

InspectExe Tutorial: Step-by-Step Static and Dynamic AnalysisInspectExe is a powerful tool for examining Windows executable files (PE files). This tutorial walks you through a practical, step-by-step workflow for both static and dynamic analysis, suitable for malware analysts, reverse engineers, and curious developers. It assumes basic familiarity with Windows internals and general reverse-engineering concepts.


Table of contents

  1. Overview and goals
  2. Preparing your environment
  3. Static analysis
    • File identification and metadata
    • PE headers and section analysis
    • Strings, imports, and exports
    • Embedded resources and certificates
    • Signature and entropy checks
  4. Dynamic analysis
    • Safe sandbox setup
    • Process execution and monitoring
    • API call tracing and behavior analysis
    • Network activity and file system changes
    • Memory inspection and unpacking
  5. Combining static and dynamic findings
  6. Reporting and remediation guidance
  7. Example full walkthrough (sample malware-like binary)
  8. Best practices and tips

1. Overview and goals

This tutorial will show how to use InspectExe to extract actionable intelligence from a Windows executable using both static techniques (no execution) and dynamic techniques (controlled execution). Goals:

  • Determine whether a binary is malicious or suspicious.
  • Understand core functionality and indicators of compromise (IOCs).
  • Extract useful artifacts for defensive measures (hashes, domains, YARA rules).

2. Preparing your environment

  • Use an isolated analysis environment: a virtual machine (VM) with snapshots. Preferably disconnected from production networks.
  • Install InspectExe and supporting tools: a hex editor, PE viewers, debugger (x64dbg or WinDbg), and network capture (Wireshark). Optionally, set up a controlled C2 simulation or sinkhole for outgoing connections.
  • Ensure the VM has host-only or NAT networking, and use routing/blocks to prevent harm.
  • Take a clean snapshot before starting.

3. Static analysis

Static analysis inspects the file without running it. It’s safe and often yields immediate indicators.

3.1 File identification and metadata

  • Calculate file hashes (MD5, SHA-1, SHA-256) for tracking and searching threat intelligence.
  • Confirm file type and architecture (x86 vs x64).
  • Check file size and timestamps for anomalies.

Key InspectExe actions:

  • Load the binary and record SHA-256 and architecture immediately.

3.2 PE headers and section analysis

  • Inspect the DOS header, NT headers, optional header and section table.
  • Note the entry point (AddressOfEntryPoint), image base, and subsystem.
  • Examine section names, sizes, and characteristics (executable, writable). Unusual or custom section names (e.g., .upx1, .packed) often indicate packing.

Look for:

  • Sections with high entropy (possible packing/encryption).
  • Executable writable sections (suspicious).
  • Mismatched sizes or missing overlay information.

3.3 Strings, imports, and exports

  • Extract readable strings; search for URLs, IPs, mutex names, C2 domains, registry keys, and suspicious commands.
  • Inspect the import table to see which Windows APIs the binary uses (networking APIs like WinINet, WinSock, CreateRemoteThread, VirtualAlloc, WriteProcessMemory are notable).
  • Examine exports for dropped libraries or plugins.

Use InspectExe to:

  • Export strings and filter by keywords (http, cmd, CreateProcess).
  • Generate an import summary showing potentially dangerous functions.

3.4 Embedded resources and certificates

  • Check embedded resources (icons, dialogs, version info) for clues about authorship or repacking.
  • Validate Authenticode signatures; absence is normal for many malware samples, but a forged or expired signature is suspicious.

3.5 Signature and entropy checks

  • Compute entropy per section. Values close to 8.0 often indicate compressed/encrypted data.
  • Use YARA rules to match known malware families.

InspectExe can:

  • Display entropy graphs and run built-in signature checks.

4. Dynamic analysis

Dynamic analysis executes the binary in a controlled manner to observe runtime behavior. Always use a sandboxed VM.

4.1 Safe sandbox setup

  • Revert to a clean snapshot.
  • Start network capture and host monitoring tools.
  • Disable guest-to-host clipboard and shared folders unless intentionally testing them.

4.2 Process execution and monitoring

  • Run the sample and observe process creation. Record parent process and command-line arguments.
  • Use InspectExe’s process monitor or integrate with Procmon/x64dbg to collect detailed events.

Watch for:

  • Process hollowing, new child processes, and service registrations.
  • Suspicious command lines or use of rundll32, regsvr32, mshta, or certutil.

4.3 API call tracing and behavior analysis

  • Trace API calls to observe network operations, file I/O, registry modifications, and code injection attempts.
  • Look for calls to VirtualAlloc/VirtualProtect followed by WriteProcessMemory/CreateRemoteThread (indicative of injection/unpacking).

InspectExe dynamic features:

  • Live API hooking and call logging to see parameters and return values.
  • Timeline view of significant events.

4.4 Network activity and file system changes

  • Capture DNS queries, HTTP requests, and raw socket traffic. Extract any C2 domains or IPs.
  • Monitor file writes, dropped files, and registry keys created/modified.

Common indicators:

  • Beacons to domains at regular intervals.
  • Use of uncommon ports or obfuscated URLs.

4.5 Memory inspection and unpacking

  • If the binary is packed, use memory dumps post-unpacking (after VirtualAlloc/Write sequence) to extract the unpacked code.
  • Search memory for PE headers (MZ, PE) and dump them for offline static analysis.

InspectExe helps by:

  • Allowing memory snapshots and automated scanning for in-memory PEs.

5. Combining static and dynamic findings

Correlate:

  • Strings found statically with actual network requests observed dynamically.
  • Imported API usage with runtime call traces (confirms capabilities).
  • High-entropy sections with memory-dumped unpacked code.

This combined approach increases confidence in verdicts and reduces false positives.


6. Reporting and remediation guidance

A concise analyst report should include:

  • Sample hashes (SHA-256), file name, size, and architecture.
  • Summary of static findings (notable imports, high-entropy sections, suspicious strings).
  • Summary of dynamic findings (process behavior, network indicators, files/registry changes).
  • IOCs: domains, IPs, mutexes, file paths.
  • Suggested mitigations: block domains/IPs, update detection signatures, isolate affected hosts, and wipe/reimage if persistence observed.

7. Example full walkthrough (concise)

  1. Load sample into InspectExe — record SHA-256 and architecture.
  2. Static: find high-entropy .rdata, imports include WinSock and VirtualAlloc, strings show suspicious domain example[.]com.
  3. Dynamic: execute in VM, observe process spawns, API trace shows VirtualAlloc + WriteProcessMemory then CreateRemoteThread.
  4. Network: DNS requests to example[.]com every 60s; HTTP POST with encoded payload.
  5. Memory: dump in-memory PE after unpacking; analyze with IDA/Ghidra to extract command handler logic.
  6. Report: include IOCs, recommended blocks, and cleanup steps.

8. Best practices and tips

  • Always start with static triage to determine risk before dynamic execution.
  • Use snapshots and revert frequently.
  • Combine multiple tools (InspectExe, Procmon, Wireshark, x64dbg) for fuller visibility.
  • Automate repetitive tasks: hash calculation, YARA scanning, and IOC extraction.
  • Maintain a personal lab checklist and a curated YARA/IOCs repo.

This tutorial outlines a practical static + dynamic workflow using InspectExe to evaluate Windows executables. Adjust each step to your environment and threat model; prioritize safety and repeatability.

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *